Difference between Gujarat Riots and ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Pundits for Secular TV Media

Difference between Gujarat Riots and ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Pundits for Secular TV Media

The pain, sufferings and animal behavior of Human Kind was displayed in both cases. So is there a difference between two kinds of Human Suffering. For Our Secular Media there is a Big Difference.

1.       Please calculate the Total Duration that these Secular Media Channels have devoted on the Gujarat Riots in comparison on the Ethnic Cleansing of the Pundits from the Valley.

2.       We do remember the Jafari case and the Name of the people who suffered that tragedy. Have we seen a single similar case discussed by the secular Media at the same length and passion from Kashmiri Pundits? There can be two reasons. Either so such similar Incident happened during the Ethnic Cleansing or the secular media never gave such importance to the same.

3.       We do remember the Bilkis Bano case. Do we know a single Bilkis Bano from the Kashmiri Pundits side? Why have they been ignored by secular media since last couple of decades?

4.       We have seen Prof Bandukwala over and over again on these Secular Media channels. Why don’t we remember the face of a single Pundit Professor who suffered the ethnic cleansing? I can mention many other such examples but it’s better that I move on.

5.       We have seen so many activists trying to get justice for the Gujarat victims. How many such Activists are fighting for the Kashmiri Pundits?

6.       We reemphasize that riot victims cannot return to their villages and are staying 2-3 Km away from the same. What is the distance between the Native village and current residence for kashmiri Pundits.

7.       We all remember the name of the Kashmiri Boy who accidently died in the Stone Pelting. We don’t know a single boy from Kashmiri Pundit who was cleansed.

8.       We view 10 Years after the Gujarat Riots on many Media channels. Have we ever seen 10 Years or 20 Years or 30 Years after the Pundits cleansing?

9.       We see every one blames BJP, Modi, VHP for the Gujarat riots. We have never seen the secular Media blaming any single entity for the Pundits Cleansing.

10.   Secular Media wants Modi to apologize for the Gujarat Riots. But the same media has never asked for any apology from anyone for the Pundits Cleansing.

Is the difference because Gujarat is more important than Kashmir or is it because Modi has to be demonized more than anybody else.

Biggest Difference between the Gujarat Riots and Sikhs Massacre

Biggest Difference between the Gujarat Riots and Sikhs Massacre

Two bloody events were forced on India. Both ink a black spot for Our Civil society.

What was the biggest difference between the two bloody events.

One happened when Congress was in power and the other when BJP was in power. NO

The Biggest Difference was MOTIVATION:

In any Criminal Case the first thing that the Prosecution does is establishes a REASON and builds a case around it. The Reason is so strong that it Motivates one to commit the crime

In Gujarat the riots happened after the tragedy of Godhra. A Train coach with Hindus was Burnt allegedly by the Minority Community. This news in modern era spread like fire. I believe there was rage running and once it overtook the Humanity GUJARAT 2002 Happened.

In 1984 we did not had internet, Private News channels and pace of flow of Information was very slow. Our Prime Minister was assassinated by her bodyguard.

What was the Motivation in 1984 that made people of Majority Community act like animal. Did the assassination of Our Late Prime Minister created that rage instantaneously Or was that Motivation 

manufactured.

The victims i.e Sikhs were more integrated with the Majority community. It must have been a very very strong Motivation that made the Majority go Insane.

If N MODI would have then Secular Media would have............

If N MODI would have then Secular Media would have............

1.       Salman Khurshid (LAW Minister) allegedly disrespected the EC. IF N Modi would have allegedly disrespected the EC.

2.       Beni Prasad (STEEL Minister) allegedly Played Minority Politics in UP Election. IF N Modi would have …..

3.       Jitin Prasad (Minister of State for Road Transport) allegedly assaulted Indian citizens at Rahul Gandhi’s rally . IF N Modi would have …..

4.       Ashok Ghelot (Chief Minister of Rajasthan) was not able to inspire confidence for Home coming of Salman Rush-die. IF N Modi would have …..

5.       Ramlilla Crackdown done by Delhi Police under Home Ministry headed by Mr Chidambaram. IF N Modi would have …..

6.       President’s son allegedly caught with cash during Election Campaign. IF N Modi would have …..

7.       RLD Leaders son allegedly caught with cash during Election Campaign. IF N Modi would have …..

8.       Mr Chidambaram is allegedly involved in 2G Spectrum. IF N Modi would have …..

9.       Government goof-up on gay sex issue. IF N Modi would have …..

10.   I can add One thousand more such incidents…

If N Modi would have been responsible or involved (DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY) with any of the above such incidents then the following would take place:

1.       Secular Activists will get more work.

2.       Secular TV Journalists will get more talking shows and discussions.

3.       News Channels will have more Breaking News Flickers running day in day out.

And Modi would have been roasted each time and chat masala would have been sprinkled again and again and chew chew chew.

SO what is the difference between a poor chicken and Mr Modi. Well the butcher gets paid only once by selling the Chicken, But Secular Activists and Secular Media Channels earn over and over again by Halaling Mr N Modi.

We will lose to Terrorism not because of failure of our Security agencies but Because of Political Opportunism

We will lose to Terrorism not because of failure of our Security agencies but Because of Political Opportunism

The Default Rule in Dealing with Terrorism in India:

1.       When you are in Power you propose for Security and Legal Frameworks to fight against Terrorism.

2.       When you are not in Power you Block all the Security and Legal Frameworks to fight against Terrorism.

Following Examples:

1.       BJP brought POTA: Congress played with Minority Politics to fail and repeal the act.

2.       Gujarat BJP brings Strong anti terror law, Congress brings in Minority Politics (Saying this will oppress Minorities)

3.       Congress brings NCTC: BJP brings in Federal Politics.

4.       Batla House Encounter: Congress brings in Tears Politics.

5.       Terrorism in Kashmir: Separatism Politics.

So next time if a terrorist strike happens, before we all blame the security agencies , we should first try and analyze that which type of Politics has caused this to happen.

People of Gujarat versus Television Media:

People of Gujarat versus Television Media:

As per the TV Reports, SIT has found no evidence against N Modi in the Jafri case.

The Breaking News Flicker for these Television Media Channels:

1.       No Prosecutable Evidence

2.       Not Enough Evidence to Implicate N Modi for the Riots.

3.       Etc…..

The above items suggest that N Modi is guilty but cannot be punished.

Anyway this is what the TV Media has been doing since the last decade.

But if today we are still discussing N Modi then it has been because of People of Gujarat.

If N Modi would have lost the last elections then all these TV Media channels would not have even spent a second on him.

So should we agree with the Majority decision that lakh of Gujarati’s have taken or should we cast our opinion on the basis of handful of secular TV Media Journalists?

If today N Modi is being discussed and is still a relevant Political figure then all the credit must go to people of Gujarat.

I believe the People of Gujarat are closer to ground reality. They saw and experienced the riots. They must know the true picture more than any TV journalist.

So should WE THE INDIANS go with the verdict that WE THE GUJARATIS have given again and again or should we go with what WE THE SECULAR TV JOURNALISTS SAY DAY IN DAY OUT.

2G: One of the best policies implemented by the government (NDA and UPA)

A Messenger (communication medium or information medium) can never be costly else it will kill the message or the information.

Why is the government not emphasizing on this.

Have we forgotten the days when postal department was in huge losses? But the cost of Post cards and Inland letters were kept to minimum. The government was not earning money from the Postal Services. But poor people needed a cost effective mechanism to communicate.

We all use emails to communicate. It is a free service that we use. The government should start taxing every email and earn Profit out of it. Why Not?

Why do newspapers cost so less. No Subsidies should be there.

To view 250 Channels the cable fee we need to pay only 300 Rs for a Month. Why?

India is an IT Hub. If Spectrum goes costly will we as remain as competitive?

There are many other examples where we are using SPECTRUM related services every day in our life.

SPCTRUM is a part of communication medium. If it gets costly it automatically will make communication very expensive for a common man. This will impact Businesses in an unprecedented manner.

2g Policy is nothing but Subsidizing Spectrum. Let’s accept it. All Indians are using that subsidy in one way or the other.

This policy has helped India grow by making communication less expensive.

If you want government to make money out of it then please remember: This money will come out of our very own Pockets. The service providers will bid for the spectrum and pay for the same but will then extract it out from customers i.e We the People. Are we ready to pay additional bills in an inflated economy?